Monday, October 26, 2009

Patterns That Sustain Barriers: One Strong Leader

Some of you have asked me to say more about the patterns that sustain barriers to learning and performance in the workplace. Here is a brief explanation of one that I see quite often in teams. The platform of this blog does not enable me to include the image, but picture a cycle for the following six stages to get a feel for this pattern:

One Strong Leader -

1) In a void, one outspoken, strong person steps up to lead the team;
2) Others fall back and are less engaged as a result;
3) As new challenges arise, the pattern re-enforces a “if nobody else will step up, I have to just go it alone” attitude and the leader is even more disproportionally engaged;
4) As time goes on, the lack of invitations for more engagement from the leader further alienates team members results in hurt feelings;
5) This lack of collaboration and open communication over time prevents issues from being discussed; and finally
6) The growing resentment re-enforces and sustains the existing pattern of one strong leader.

In this situations, it is critical for the strong leader to maintain a broader awareness of the team dynamic. Despite their good intentions, strong leaders must recognize that going it alone is seldom - if ever - a good option. He or she must work hard to engage others, especially those that may not be as outspoken. As far as the team members, it is not reasonable to withdraw and complain. That makes them complicit in the team dysfunction. Everyone must work hard to express their concerns, then step up to the plate to take responsibility for rectifying their part of the problem.

Monday, October 12, 2009

“How to Bring Out the Best in Others When All You See is Their Worst”

There’s nothing better than hanging up the phone or walking out of a meeting when the person you worked with not only did their job, but they made it easier for you to do yours too. Unfortunately, the reason it feels so refreshing is because it doesn’t happen very often. Too frequently our interactions with associates, customer service reps and clients result in disappointment and ineffective outcomes.

Working with difficult people is a defining experience for all of us. It’s a universal occurrence for everyone because we interpret behavior differently and at some point, each of us becomes the difficult person to someone else. For those who are good communicators and consistently courteous, it may be a bad day here and there. For others who have significant challenges with interpersonal effectiveness, they may not ever ‘play nice’.

Arrogant, smug, condescending, patronizing, inept, sarcastic, blasé, uninformed – these words are often used to describe the behavior and/or personality of a difficult person. Despite the fact that it can feel intentional, many difficult people are simply producing behaviors from the negative side of their personality. In other words, we’re working with them when they are not operating from their strengths. Understanding what makes people feel difficult to us often makes it less frustrating to deal with them. When we encounter a difficult person, one of the best things we can do is to observe how we are triggered by them and take personal responsibility for shifting the interaction to a more positive place.

How can we turn the tide when we get off on the wrong foot with a person? How can we make progress when it seems a person’s only objective is to prevent it? And, how can we inspire others to think and act in more helpful ways? Consider the following strategies to help bring out the best in others when all you see is their worst:

When There Is Confusion
When a situation turns negative, often there is some degree of confusion or miscommunication involved. Before things get worse, ask the person to clarify their understanding of the situation. Listen respectfully to de-escalate emotions and then offer your perspective. Use it as an opportunity to be crystal clear about the situation.

When It Is A Question Of Motivation

It’s not our responsibility to help other people enjoy their lives or like their jobs. However, human nature is a blend of complex emotions and at times we have to know how to motivate others to help us. If they do not offer to provide the support you need, find a way to connect with this person to motivate them to work with you.

When It Is A Question Of Skill
When the skill level required to complete a task is too far out in front of a person’s ability, they can often be stretched to the point of negative stress and defensive action. To avoid exacerbating the situation, attempt to balance the skill gap with your own abilities, or attempt to work with someone who possesses the necessary knowledge and skills.

If They Become Defensive
If you anticipate that the person will react defensively, avoid interrogating questions and try to describe the problem/request in more objective terms. Use non-blaming language, remain calm, keep a sense of humor if you can, and try to make it a mutual problem to solve. Always be tough on the problem and easy on the people.

If You Feel Like Giving Up On Them
Don’t give up on a person too soon! There are some people that are difficult to work with no matter what approach you take, however, most people are not like that. Facing an initial obstacle or road block does not warrant the conclusion that ‘I just can’t work with this person’.

The next time you interact with a difficult person, hang in there and take the high road whenever you can. Imagine what’s possible if we all brought out the best in others when all we saw was their worst...

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Doing Less with Less

The business world is booming with axiomatic statements about the need to do more with less. Unfortunately, the tales of workforce reduction are turning into a kind of bragging right. The other day I heard a manager smugly say that she is now doing the work of three people! Really?

The downturn is definitely requiring more from everyone, however, in most cases people are simply doing less with less. It is a myth to think that one can flip a switch and double or triple their capacity overnight. While the fat trimming does create more capacity, it is not at the level required by most cutbacks. So what does this mean for those who survive the cutbacks? Let’s use process of elimination to get to a reasonable conclusion:

Should we just multitask more?
No, multitasking is not the answer. Although multitasking has been widely recognized as an important skill in today’s competitive business environment, research indicates that multitasking not only results in the loss of time, but it reduces our overall effectiveness and the accuracy of our work.

Should we just work more days and longer hours?
No, working harder is not the answer. While there may be some short-term benefit from this extra time, burn out from this tact would further cripple the productivity of the workforce.

Should we re-focus our priorities on the most essential organizational objectives and then set aside the appropriate level of resources required to meet them?
Yes, in my experience this is the best response to the often unreasonable mandate to do more with less.

Let’s face it; everything is not created equal in the workplace. One of the most common mistakes managers and leaders make is to treat all outcomes the same. This is called whitewashing because everything is made to look the same on the surface. When we treat all goals and outcomes the same, we inadvertently divert our energy and attention away from the most critical priorities. In a challenging business environment, this distraction from essential priorities can be a fatal flaw. The valiant, but miserable attempts to do “more with less” risks leaving the more difficult challenges left undone.

Focusing on priorities in this way requires us to be brutally honest about what matters most and to make hard choices about which goals are just not that important. In the end, you’ll get more of what matters most – done.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Mediation Tips For Business Owners

Today’s current business owner and tomorrow’s entrepreneur alike require a range of critical skills to successfully navigate the challenges of doing business. Often overlooked and undervalued are the soft, people skills that mark the difference between deal-making and deal-breaking. One’s ability to mediate opposing interests and find win-win solutions in the face of conflict is a considerable leverage point that can save time, money and get results.

Here are a few quick tips for the businessperson to remember when opposing viewpoints or agendas need to come together:

- Attack the problem, not the person. Remember to be hard on the substance of the dispute but soft on the people. Although emotions may rise, both parties are in the same situation. Step back, separate the person from the problem and make a good faith attempt to put energy into solutions vs. blaming.

- Reframe for easier understanding. The way you speak your mind is often more important than what you say. To hear and be heard, use open language that expresses the simple points. Avoid comments embellished with condescending jargon, personal attacks or negative tones.

- Find ways to create more value. It is easy to focus on a ‘fixed-pie’, or a finite set of value when competing. Try to expand the pie by understanding deeper interests that could lead to other possible points of agreement.